Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Mormonism’s god has been described by various Mormon officials, and yet the LDS church today wants to act as if some of the ideas presented were just opinions. Let’s look at some of what Mormons have been taught over the years, none of which is compatible with the God of the Jews and Christians.
The first concept to review can be found at:
It is a sermon by Joseph Smith on June 16, 1844, just eleven days before he was killed in a shoot-out (no, he was not martyred - he fought back). I will just post excerpts.
It has been my intention for a long time to take up this subject and lay it clearly before the people, and show what my faith is in relation to this interesting matter. I have contemplated the saying of Jesus (Luke 17th chapter, 26th verse)—"And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of Man." And if it does rain, I'll preach this doctrine, for the truth shall be preached.
I will preach on the plurality of Gods. I have selected this text for that express purpose. I wish to declare I have always and in all congregations when I have preached on the subject of the Deity, it has been the plurality of Gods. It has been preached by the Elders for fifteen years.
I have always declared God to be a distinct personage, Jesus Christ a separate and distinct personage from God the Father, and that the Holy Ghost was a distinct personage and a Spirit: and these three constitute three distinct personages and three Gods. If this is in accordance with the New Testament, lo and behold! we have three Gods anyhow, and they are plural: and who can contradict it!
We can immediately see that Smith believed in and taught multiple gods versus the Bible’s one, and only one, GOD. And if you take the time to read the entire text, you will see how much he had to mangle Scripture to “prove” his case.
I have it from God, and get over it if you can. I have a witness of the Holy Ghost, and a testimony that Paul had no allusion to the heathen gods in the text. I will show from the Hebrew Bible that I am correct, and the first word shows a plurality of Gods; and I want the apostates and learned men to come here and prove to the contrary, if they can. (my emphasis)
Notice that Smith said he received this information directly from God - a direct revelation.
The head God organized the heavens and the earth. I defy all the world to refute me. In the beginning the heads of the Gods organized the heavens and the earth.
Notice Smith has a “head” god and all he did was “organize the heavens and the earth” - he did not create them! This is contrary to the Bible, which has ONE God who created everything.
The heads of the Gods appointed one God for us; and when you take [that] view of the subject, it sets one free to see all the beauty, holiness and perfection of the Gods.
Notice now that the god of the earth has been appointed by numerous “heads of the Gods.”
Many men say there is one God; the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost are only one God! I say that is a strange God anyhow—three in one, and one in three! It is a curious organization. ... All are to be crammed into one God, according to sectarianism. It would make the biggest God in all the world. He would be a wonderfully big God—he would be a giant or a monster.
Rather than try to understand the doctrine of the Trinity, Smith mocked it and made a polytheistic universe.
I learned it by translating the papyrus which is now in my house. I learned a testimony concerning Abraham, and he reasoned concerning the God of heaven.
This is an interesting claim about the Book of Abraham, which has been proven beyond a doubt to be a fraud. Smith did not translate the Egyptian funeral document, no did he get ANY information from it, and yet he makes a claim for his polytheism based on the BoA as well as direct revelation.
If Abraham reasoned thus—If Jesus Christ was the Son of God, and John discovered that God the Father of Jesus Christ had a Father, you may suppose that He had a Father also. Where was there ever a son without a father? And where was there ever a father without first being a son? Whenever did a tree or anything spring into existence without a progenitor? And everything comes in this way. Paul says that which is earthly is in the likeness of that which is heavenly, Hence if Jesus had a Father, can we not believe that He had a Father also? I despise the idea of being scared to death at such a doctrine, for the Bible is full of it. I want you to pay particular attention to what I am saying. Jesus said that the Father wrought precisely in the same way as His Father had done before Him. As the Father had done before. He laid down His life, and took it up the same as His Father had done before. He did as He was sent, to lay down His life and take it up again; and then was committed unto Him the keys, &c. I know it is good reasoning.
Without biblical support, Smith claimed that the Apostle John discovered that God the Father had a father; where in scripture did he find this? The he also made a claim about Jesus speaking of God’s father - where is this in the Bible?
“Go and read the vision in the Book of Covenants.”
Smith appeals to a vision he claimed he had, a vision which defies Scripture. Since he has been proven a false prophet, that his visions never happened, why should anyone refer to a false vision for verification?
The scriptures are a mixture of very strange doctrines to the Christian world, who are blindly led by the blind.
A very ironic statement from the man who had truly strange doctrines, who was spiritually blind and has been leading the spiritually blind for over 180 years.
Another piece of “Smithism” is Doctrine & Covenants 130:22 wherein Smith says, “The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s.”
What about the 2nd Prophet/President of Mormons, Brigham Young? On April 9, 1852 Brigham taught that Adam was God! Exactly how this works out with Joseph’s teachings is unclear. But let’s look at some of this sermon:
Our God and Father in heaven, is a being of tabernacle, or, in other words, He has a body, with parts the same as you and I have;
Looking at these two last statements - one by Smith and one by Young - I wonder why, then, that the Bible would say God is “Spirit” (John 4:24)? And that a Spirit doesn’t have “flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39)?
When our father Adam came into the garden of Eden, he came into it with a celestial body, and brought Eve, one of his wives, with him. He helped to make and organize this world. He is MICHAEL, the Archangel, the ANCIENT OF DAYS! about whom holy men have written and spoken--HE is our FATHER and our GOD, and the only God with whom WE have to do
Whoa up there! Let’s see, Adam was already married to Eve and brought her with him to the Garden of Eden. (Doesn’t this contradict Genesis 1 and 2?.) Then Young states that Adam helped to “make and organize this world,” yet the Bible says that Adam himself was created on the last day of God’s creative work! Wait, they Young said Adam is Michael the Archangel, yet angels are separate creations from man in the Bible. Further, Michael is also “the ANCIENT OF DAYS,” but Daniel 7 says this is God the Father, who also happens to be the creator of all angels. But wait, Adam is also “our God, and the only God with who WE have to do.” So God created himself as Adam the man, but really created Adam the angel who just happened to be man at the same time, but who is also God?!? So God created himself?
They came here, organized the raw material, and arranged in their order the herbs of the field, the trees, the apple, the peach, the plum, the pear, and every other fruit that is desirable and good for man; the seed was brought from another sphere, and planted in this earth. The thistle, and thorn, the brier, and the obnoxious weed did not appear until after the earth was cursed.
So Adam/God and his wife Eve came to earth with seeds from another planet (directed panspermia?) and organized it all into all the plants? Does that mean someone else brought weed and thorn seeds from another planet after the curse? Or did God come as another man with another wife to do this?
And who is the Father? He is the first of the human family; and when he took a tabernacle, it was begotten by his Father in heaven, after the same manner as the tabernacles of Cain, Abel, and the rest of the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve; from the fruits of the earth, the first earthly tabernacles were originated by the Father, and so on in succession.
This does go along with Smith’s teaching here, in that Brigham says God was once a human who had his own “Father in heaven,” “and so on in succession.” However, Smith never said God was “the first of the human family,” i.e., Adam.
It is true that the earth was organized by three distinct characters, namely, Eloheim, Yahovah, and Michael, these three forming a quorum, as in all heavenly bodies, and in organizing element, perfectly represented in the Deity, as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
So, the earth was not created, rather it was “organized” out of eternal matter, and this organization was done by “three distinct characters.” Why does the Bible say God alone created the earth? And we now have another identity - that of the Holy Ghost being Michael! But I thought Michael was Adam and Adam is the Father? Are you as confused as I am?
In the June 18, 1873 edition of the Deseret News, on p.308, Brigham Young declared this doctrine was revealed to him by God:
How much unbelief exists in the minds of Latter-day Saints in regard to one particular doctrine which is revealed to them, and which God revealed to me - namely that Adam is our father and God.
So if the Adam-God doctrine was revealed by God to a prophet/president of the LDS church, then Mormons cannot logically deny this belief, so instead claim that Brigham Young misunderstood God!!!! Another charge, of course, is that the sermon was “erroneously transcribed.” Contrary to plain history and the documents to back it up, Spencer W. Kimball said this doctrine was “alleged to have been taught.” LDS apostles have even called this a heresy. Regardless of the fact that Young stated it was revealed to him by God, many LDS officials denounce the teaching and claim Brigham Young just “expressed views.”
This article just scratches the surface of the many facets of the false god of Mormonism, a god who may or may not have been Adam in the Garden of Eden, a god who is fully human and who worked his way to become a god rather than the eternal God of the Bible, and as a fully human god it is impossible for him to be omnipresent and omniscient as the true God of true Christians.
Friday, May 25, 2012
Well, it looks like Liberty University is sliding into politically-correct apostasy; they have “no official position” about Mormonism. How can any Christian not have a position as to whether or not the LDS is a cult?!?
The International House of Prayer in Kansas City preys on Christian youth by their very charismatic and musical productions. IHOP is mostly aberrant and often heretical in their doctrines and teachings. Yvonne over at “...and the world hears them” has posted a video of what looks to me to be demonic manifestations over at IHOP. Stay away from this place and anyone who teaches there.
Speaking of heresy, the Word of Faith teachings definitely fall into that category and there are too many WOF heretics out there to keep up with. “Pastrix” Dayna Muldoon is a new name to me, but she has apparently been around for a while. She finally ran into someone who exposed her publicly and she doesn’t seem to be to happy about it! Now for the background and what happened prior to that video, the pastor exposing her fraud describes everything at CARM’s blog.
The sad thing now is that an excellent Bible teacher, David Jeremiah, has now given these WOF heretics credence by being a guest speaker on TBN’s “Praise-A-Thon” and not only praising heretic Paul Crouch, but telling of his involvement with this heretical organization over the last few years!!!!!
Brian McLaren, in his recent brainwashing “Children, Youth and a New Kind of Christianity Conference,” warned against Bible passages that supposed are “texts of terror.” He also said that “Bible-preaching/teaching/reading people are the most dangerous in the world for Muslims.” This conference was not only an Emergent forum, but it also appeared to be a haven of liberal “Christians” of every stripe, including apostates and heretics.
Roman Catholics claim to be the one true church, and yet daily we find them supporting things that Christ would have nothing to do with - and this is aside from their aberrant and heretical doctrines! Up in Canada a Catholic elementary school hosted the “transgendered” (read “mutilated”) man who was a contestant for Miss Universe Canada. Okay, to be fair, they hosted all 62 contestants, but since hosting the man was giving tacit approval to his perversion, he should not have been allowed. And aside from hosting this man, the school was promoting the whole idea of girls being “sexy and glamourous” - a message for elementary school girls!!! Yep, I’m sure Christ would approve of this - NOT!
An article in the Austin, MN, Daily Herald by a retired UMC pastor claims that since Mormons have faith in one God they are then Christians. I certainly hope this doesn’t reflect UMC teachings! Mormonism is no more Christian than is Satanism!
Going back to the subject from last report, about “The Voice” translation of the Bible, Ken Ham points out another problem with this agenda-driven version - the allowance for evolution!
A good article by Erin Benziger was posted at the Christian Research Network, covering the history and teachings of “Spiritual Formation,” which is a false teaching invading the Church over the past few decades.
I’ve previously posted a couple articles about the movie Courageous; one being my own review and the other one highlighting some other critiques. This week I came across another excellent critique which I highly recommend. While this is a good movie, there are many concerns for Christians to be aware of. (Be sure to read the thought-provoking comment discussion).
One of the problems with seeker-sensitive “pastors” is their irreverence for God and Christ. (One of the things which bothers me also about Mark Driscoll.) For a good example of how crass these teachers can get, Ken Silva has posted a video clip of Eric Dykstra. Believe me when I tell you that if I had been in that assembly, I would have stood up and ran out the door!
The blog “Herescope” has been presenting a good series examining some of the various aberrations that come into the Church through the ministry of Chuck Missler. Titled, “Cosms, Codes, and Cryptologies,” there are five articles so far. While lengthy, I do highly recommend them, especially if you are a fan of Missler:
Part 2: Cosmic Cryptology in the Church
Part 3: The Emerging ENIGMA Bible
Part 4: False Eschatology Arising!
Part 5: Quantum Teleporting Through Time
I am one who really dislikes most “contemporary Christian music,” mostly because I really can’t stand the rock and roll music with so much of it. However, when I analyze such songs for proper use in the assembly, I try to stick with examining the lyrics. This past week I discovered a great site which will be very helpful with this, “Worship Song Ratings.” It also has a couple links to examining the music. I recommend it for your perusal.
Finally, I have read several places about supposed “same-sex wedding ceremonies” in the early Christian church. Of course I never gave any of this stuff credence because I’m not that gullible. I came across an excellent article this week to put in your apologetics tool box for responding to this claim. I think you’ll find it well-worth it.
Sunday, May 20, 2012
This story reveals the truth to us that salvation is conditioned upon repentance and faith. However, it contains other important messages also. It declares that salvation is independent of sacraments. The thief had never been baptized, nor had he partaken of the Lord’s Supper. ... He did in fact boldly profess his faith in the presence of a hostile crowd and amid the taunts and jeers of rulers and soldiers, yet he was saved without any formal rites. It is further evident that salvation is independent of good works. ... It is also seen that there is no “sleep of the soul.” The body may sleep, but consciousness exists after death. Again it is evident that there is no “purgatory.” Out of a life of sin and shame, the penitent robber passed immediately into a state of blessedness. Again it may be remarked that salvation is not universal. There were two robbers; only one was saved. Last of all it may be noted that the very essence of the joy which lies beyond death consists in personal communion with Christ. The heart of the promise to the dying thief was this: “Thou shalt be with me.” This is our blessed assurance, that to depart is “to be with Christ” which is “very far better.”
Charles R. Erdman, The Gospel of Luke, pp. 217,218. Cited by William MacDonald in The Believer’s Bible Commentary.
Friday, May 18, 2012
Without biblical discernment, this upcoming generation is "adrift at sea"--heading for a rocky coast and pending shipwreck. As I have had the opportunity to speak with young people throughout the U.S. and around the world, many of whom seem to be biblically knowledgeable, I've found that they are largely ignorant of false teachings, movements, and practices, along with the false teachers who are seducing multitudes of Christians today. ...
When the full counsel of God's Word is not taken to heart and put into practice, there is little basis for spiritual growth. Often the result is an experiential faith, based upon subjective feelings rather than the objective Word of Truth. Such a condition produces a shallow if not false faith and completely eliminates biblical discernment.
T.A. McMahon, “A Generation Adrift,” The Berean Call, May 2012.
When we went to the St. Louis Conference on Biblical Discernment in April, we took two high school seniors with us. They were astonished at all the false teachings they learned about, having never previously heard of such things. This is why our youth can be so easily capture by false teachings - because they are not warned about it in their church assembly! Which is why the heretical IHOP organization can recruit youth by the scores.
Just remember that cults aren’t the only danger, and in fact are not near the danger to those in the Church as are the false teachings by those within the Church. Aside from IHOP, how many know about Word of Faith and its teachers? How many know about the Emergent heresy? What about the many subtle false teachers, such as Beth Moore and others I’ve noted on this blog? What about psychology in the Church, yoga in the Church or Tae Kwon Do in the Church - all of which are compromising the faith? We need to teach the errors of “seeker-sensitive” and “market-driven” movements, theistic evolutionism, aberrant “spiritual warfare,” Dominion theology, the social gospel, and on and on and on - all coming from INSIDE the Church!
Parents and youth ministries need to expose our young people to what errors are out there, and demonstrate the errors biblically so as to provide them with a defense against the wiles of Satan.
Monday, May 14, 2012
First, an update on Andy Stanley’s apparent approval of homosexuality. I’d say with the language he uses against Christians - i.e., calling us “judgmental, homophobic, moralists” - demonstrates his sympathies. It really looks like Stanley is joining the Emergent wolves.
Roman Catholics really need to clean up their house. Here’s another example of Romanists supporting all that is unholy: Catholics in Media, a group which purports to recognize movies and television shows that “[make] clearer the Word of God” and “help us better understand what it is to be part of the human family,” has given an award to “Modern Family,” a sitcom with a homosexual couple. The show is anything BUT a proper “human family,” and surely denigrates the Word of God. Why has the Pope not condemned this group?
The Episcopal Church continues its blatant support of same-sex fake marriage. Four of their so-called bishops came out in complete opposition to the North Carolina constitutional amendment which was to prevent re-defining marriage to include same-sex unions. And yet the Episcopal Church does not excommunicate these “bishops.”
Of course their “mother church,” the Church of England, has the same problem with advocacy of same-sex fake marriage. A lay minister has been temporarily banned from preaching because he had the audacity to speak up for real marriage.
As I have stated before, Mark Driscoll is not qualified to be a pastor. This article examines his attitude towards those taking a doctrinal stance on teaching. Yeah, Driscoll’s cool - a cool wolf.
Rick Warren’s Saddleback church keeps proving how far they keep going from orthodoxy. Believe it or not, their men’s group studied heretic Joyce Meyer’s horrid teaching in her book, “Battlefield of the Mind.” This book is rife with false teaching! What is any Christian group, let a lone a men’s group, doing studying this false teacher’s material?!?
Wouldn’t you know it; a new movie comes out and false teachers are using it to make their sermons more exciting for the goats. I thought about watching the movie, “The Avengers,” but I don’t know if I can handle it now.
More on T.D. Jakes, and whether or not he is truly a false teaching heretic. I’d say anyone who praises Paul Crouch for anything has absolutely NO discernment. Jakes is solidly in the Word of Faith crowd.
The book, “Pagan Christianity,” by Gene Edwards and Frank Viola, has certainly caused a lot of division in the church. A friend of mine swears by that book, and is part of a home church built on ideas from it. I had never read the book until this friend kept telling me how great some of the teachings were - which I told him were wrong - so I finally went out and bought the book and read it last year. I came across a site this week which really dissects this book, demonstrating all the errors and historical revisionism. I highly recommend visiting “Pagan Christianity?” and perusing the articles. Aside from addressing that book, it also has a good review on the heretical book, “The Shack,” as well as an article on Viola in general.
More information about “The Voice” translation of the Bible. I guess I’m a bit behind on this version, although I mentioned some reviews in a previous “Random” post in April. This week I came across this article by Lighthouse Trails Research demonstrating the “translation” is indeed no more than a prop for the Emergent church. Don’t waste your money on it.
Erin has more about heretic Shane Hipps at Willow Creek. The fact that Willow Creek would even invite him to speak demonstrates the lack of discernment in the leadership. Reading what Erin has to say about Hipps explains why it was unconscionable for Willow Creek leadership to have him speak there.
I came across this interesting article about why gender really matters in Christian counseling. This is certainly something which should be considered by all Christians.
Finally, I was really amused by this article about Hindus wanting to take yoga back. There are way too many “Christian Yoga” classes going on. Ladies and gentlemen, yoga is a blatant Hindu practice and cannot in any way, shape or form be “Christianized.” If you have been practicing this, leave it immediately.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
The following are the notes I took during a plenary session taught by Ron Rhodes at the 2012 St. Louis Conference on Biblical Discernment. There are some good things to think about.
Counterfeit Jesus + counterfeit gospel = counterfeit salvation.
1. Don’t assume all cultists believe the same thing. Ask them what they believe - don’t tell them what they believe.
2. Know your Bible
3. Beware that cultists are trained to answer objections. Take the discussion to the Bible and keep it there.
4. Always check the Bible when citations are given. This way you can demonstrate context.
5. Define terms. They talk the same language with different meanings.
6. Ask Strategic Questions; make them think.
e.g. Jehovah’s Witnesses: was God without witness for over 18 centuries? How can Jesus be “mighty God” with Deut. 32:39; Isa. 45:5. 1961 NWT Bible, Hebrews 1:6 says “worship,” while 1971 version says “do obeisance” - why the change?
Good resource is http://www.witnessinc.com/
7. Be loving - be humble! Avoid highly critical approach.
8. Demonstrate the Deity of Christ:
a. Isa. 44:24 cf. Col. 1:16 Creator
b. Isa. 43:11 cf. Tit. 2:13-14 Savior
c. Isa. 6:1-5 cf. Jn. 12:41 Glory
9. Emphasize God’s Gospel of Grace. Paint a dark picture of what they “need” for salvation and then provide the light of the Gospel. e.g. LDS “be ye perfect” - a rope to heaven; how far could you get? Joseph Fielding Smith said we must be better today than yesterday!
10. Give your testimony. Ask them, “Are you ready to die?”
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Christ died to make it possible for you to cease to sin, and sin is the transgression of the law. (The Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, vol. 71, no.35, p.1, 8/28/1894)
To be redeemed means to cease from sin. (The Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, vol. 77, no.39, p.1, 9/25/1900)
To every one who surrenders fully to God is given the privilege of living without sin, in obedience to the law of heaven.... God requires of us perfect obedience. We are to purify ourselves, even as he is pure. (The Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, 9/27/1906, p.8)
These statements are teachings of Ellen G. White, Seventh-day Adventist prophet.
Does Scripture say that we are able to cease from sin? NO! Does being redeemed mean that we cease from sin? NO! In fact, 1 John 1:8 says, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.” Paul talked about how he did the things he didn’t want to do and didn’t do the things he wanted to do (Romans 7). Can we attain “perfect obedience”? NO! 2 Corinthians 7:1 says we are to “strive to be completely holy,” not that we will ever attain it this side of heaven.
For White to claim sinlessness she must directly contradict Scripture. Scripture doesn’t say we will cease sinning or that we will be able to perfectly obey God this side of heaven. What it does say is that God forgives us and “remembers our sin no more.”
It is a heretical works-oriented system that keeps its followers in such impossible bondage.
Friday, May 4, 2012
It’s that time again to expose the stuff I’ve found in the news since my last Random post. Sometimes this stuff can really be discouraging and frustrating to learn, but someone has to expose these false teachers and false teachings for what they are so as to warn the sheep to keep away from wolves.
Steve Harvey was a new name to me, but since he appeared on TBN it is obvious where his theology lies. At any rate, he as a written a book where he gives a “90 day rule” - i.e., date for 90 days before fornicating. After all, people are going to fornicate so it is unreasonable to ask them to wait for marriage, but it isn’t unreasonable to ask them to get to know each other a bit better. Heretic Paula White agreed with him (what do you expect from a heretic?). On thing I take issue with in this article is that the author calls TBN “Christian” television. Sorry, but that station doesn’t have anyone who preaches the truth about Christ; it is a station of blatant heresy. Otherwise, the examination of this fornication teaching is excellent.
The ever-heretical Joel Osteen is again claiming Mormonism is Christian. I really wish the media would quit seeking him out for discussing Christianity; the man has no clue about his proclaimed faith, let alone LDS. But there is good news: Osteen actually admits to teaching the heretical prosperity gospel.
Spiritual Formation has become a fad, especially with Emergent churches, but it has actually been around for quite a while, with one of the main origins being mystic Richard Foster. Spiritual Formation is unbiblical mysticism - period. Lighthouse trails has an excellent article about this false teaching. Bob DeWaay had a good article about Foster’s false teaching a couple years ago which is still worth reading.
I really can’t understand the Roman Catholic Church’s love affair with the false belief system of evolutionism. Their latest foray into this nonsense is the official Bible used in Latin American countries, which promotes evolutionism in Genesis! What is evolutionism doing in a Bible to begin with, except for that fact it helps promotes Satan’s agenda. Ken Ham has a good article about the situation.
Hank Hanegraaff seems to be going farther and farther into left field. Previously he has gone easy on Roman Catholicism, then he defended the Local Church, now he is promoting Occupy Wall Street - In Tehran of all places? Does this mean he’s beginning to support the social gospel? This blog has a good article about the situation, with links for fuller information. The problem is that there is no direct link to articles on this blog, so you need to go to April 24th, but it’s worth the read.
More problems with “gay marriage” being given at least tacit support by so-called Christians. Look what has taken place recently at a conference on “sexuality and covenant” with some things stated about marriage. More sliding to apostasy.
Going along with the promotion of same-sex fake marriage by apostate churches, we have news that the Episcopal Church has released a draft of same-sex union rites! Well, I have reported many times in the past about this apostate denomination, but this just demonstrates how far they are descending into the pit.
And another concern in this area is Andy Stanley’s latest comments, reported on by Albert Mohler and Denny Burke. It sure seems that Stanley becoming favorable towards acceptance of homosexual behavior. It will be interesting to see how this develops.
Rather than properly teach youth about the Gospel and everything else in the Bible, along with teaching them how it should affect their worldview, it seems too many assemblies today are more interested in spiritual junk food. An Assemblies of God church has gone way overboard and staged a kidnapping, ostensibly so the youth would know what persecution is like. The teen did NOT know it wasn’t a real kidnapping and suffered emotional trauma and some injury. This is a youth pastor who should be fired.
Steve Munsey is another false teacher I’ve seen for the first time. Here is his preaching about the Resurrection - or at least I think that’s what it is supposed to be. I see his congregation is full of people who are more interested in gimmicks and feel-goodism than they are about the Word of God.
Willow Creek was on the cutting edge of the unbiblical idea of “market-driven” mentality - one of the original “seeker-sensitive” churches. Over the years the continually have demonstrated that sticking to truth and doctrinal standards is something they don’t choose to do. Remember, this assembly has allowed Imams to teach from the pulpit, to prove that Islam is a peaceful, God-fearing religion similar to Christianity. More recently, Bill Hybels, their leader, has stepped all over himself to prove they are not “anti-gay” (whatever that is supposed to mean) as he severed Willow Creek’s relationship with Exodus International. Now he’s putting a rank heretic in the pulpit - Shane Hipps. When you start pandering to the world to draw in your audience, anything goes.
Meanwhile, homosexual advocate Tony Campolo is at it again in his support for those pressing the United Methodist Church to accept same-sex fake marriage. But not only does he praise them, but he also goes into some of his usual promotion of the social gospel as well as usual complaints, such as attacking the Roman Catholic Church for not allowing women priests. The man is a bonafide heretic, and the sheep should be warned to keep away from this wolf and his teachings.
Finally, Erin reports on a “worship” song which is really weird and unbiblical, regardless of the nuances the author claims are really there. To me, it sounds much like another “Jesus is my boyfriend” story.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
I’m just beginning to type up the notes I took at the St. Louis Conference on Biblical Discernment, which was held April 19-21. I have decided to post them as I finish them. This is the first workshop class we attended.
IHOP notes from Keith Gibson’s class at PFO 2012
Young people are IHOP’s main targets.
The person leaving orthodoxy has left the Church and is the divisive one.
Every N.T. book - except Philemon - warns against false teachers/doctrine.
IHOP followers are zealous, but Paul points out that zeal without knowledge is dangerous; Rom. 10:2
1. Personal revelations of Bickle and company supposedly from God. Bickle claims God said, “I am going to change the understanding of the expression of Christianity on earth in one generation.”
2. Prophetic hermeneutic: Bible means what their prophet says it means today.
3. Aberrant Doctrines & practices.
a. Latter Rain/Manifest Sons of God
b. Bridal Paradigm: Lovesick Jesus. Song of Solomon allegory of Christ and the Church is literalized for the individual Christian. Yet Christ is the Bride of the Church vs the individual believer. Forces men to worship in a feminized way. “Boyfriend Jesus.” The “Call” includes marriage ceremonies to Jesus. Shawn Bolz is IHOPer
c. Man centered
d. No doctrine of sin.
e. Fallible prophets. 1/3 of prophecies by God can be false.
f. Spiritual mapping/SLSW
g. Elected Seed. New Breed. Uniqueness of final generation.
h. Prophetic healing (?)(couldn’t read writing)
i. Contemplative prayer
j. Revisionist history - editing their prophecies.
4. Lack of balance. Virtually no N.T. teachings. Ignoring Biblical norms: Many claim to be “caught up to heaven,” with 3rd heaven visitations.
5. Support of other false teachers.