Over the past 6.5 years that I’ve had this blog, various Christian commenters have accused me of deciding who is or is not a Christian, or what denomination is or is not Christian, all based on my “particular interpretation of the Bible.” (This is a common attack on every apologist and apologetics ministry I’ve encountered.) A virulent atheist who has had discussions with me on other blogs (and who really hate’s fundamental Christians) has stated, “You live in this fantasy bubble where Glenn E. Chatfield is the sole arbiter of what the Bible says and means.”
Supporting homosexuality and same-sex fake marriage.
Supporting abortion.
Teaching evolution instead of creation.
Low view of Scripture, including mythologizing Genesis.
Teaching the social gospel.
Emergent teachings.
Mysticism, including contemplative prayer, labyrinth, visualization.
8 comments:
Excellent summary and distinctions. I completely agree with your assessment of the Catholic religion and its members.
"A virulent atheist who has had discussions with me on other blogs..."
I am just mystified as to whom you might be referring...not.
Well stated!
Very useful post. Thank you!
I have a problem with Christians who carry on about ecumenism and think they are enlightened because they engage in "deep" conversations with people of various denominations for the sake of comparing beliefs. They say they learn so much from each other. The only result of that is going to be the watering down of their faith. All discussions about faith should begin in the Bible and stay there.
The older I get the less I like denominations. I really think the Bible teaches that we should form local congregations where pastor and people see each other face to face and really know each other, explore the Bible together, and mature in the faith. That's where it gets real.
Glenn, very reserved in your tone...
Even though I do not agree with you, you wrote without calling anyone pinheads, idiots and any other condescending or insulting names.
Why do you adopt one persona here, and another when you are interacting with others elsewhere?
Let me ask you a question, as you have stated you use good hermeneutical methods.
How do you determine when what the bible is saying is a statement for a particular time and culture, as opposed to a timeless command or expectation?
Dave,
I call them as I see them. If anyone behaves in a particular way, I call them by their behavior.
Read enough of my comments on this blog and you will see where I call people "pharisees," "false prophets," "false teachers," and even "liars."
Context is what determines particular time and culture vs timeless command and expectation. Context isn't all that difficult to understand if you aren't bringing an agenda to the table.
Excellent post! Thank you, Laura
Hi Glenn,
"This is a common question by atheists who have no real understanding of Christianity; the “True Church” is all believing Christians. It is not a particular organization or denomination - it is the believers!"
Bingo. The True Church is comprised solely of those who have been born again by the Holy Spirit, John 3:3.
The gate is narrow, and sadly few find eternal life.
-Carolyn
Right behind you, Glenn, 100%.
Canada
Post a Comment