I’d also like to see a Mormon explain how their President/Prophet can teach something that doesn’t represent the Mormon church!
There is a group of apostates and heretics who claim the title of “Progressive Evangelicals,” but they are really “CINOs” — "Christians In Name Only." A group of these PE/CINOs actually have the audacity to call themselves, “Evangelicals for Marriage Equality,” while launching an anti-marriage campaign promoting support for same-sex fake marriage among the Church! Chelsen Vicari has a good commentary about this group.
A Bishop of the Episcopal Church worships the creation rather than the Creator. I’d wonder why he hasn’t been excommunicated except the answer is the Episcopal Church.
Sola Sisters have a thought-provoking article about the Patriarchy and Quiverfull movements.
The claim to fame of this “church” is that they are “affirming” of sexually perverse lifestyles; they affirm and celebrate that which is an abomination to God. It is a subject of our local news because a branch just opened locally. Oh, and if you disagree with them, you are labeled as a “hater.” I guess God is a “hater” also.
5 comments:
Hi Glenn,
Great RAAH today.
I had to LOL about "Tiber Creek CC"... is that seriously happening, or is that a satire piece?
Either way, I detest the phrase "relevant". Usually churches that think they are making their services more "relevant" actually make their services **irreverent**. Been there, seen - and left - that.
When the secular media can see MDs problems, but many in the church cannot, we're in trouble.
Recovering Grace and Sola Sisters articles were both good. So was Elizabeth Prata's.
With the SS article, I admit I had to chuckle that two of the "featured couples" in Harris's pro-courtship book are now divorced. I'm not laughing that they got divorced (that is very sad news), but rather I am laughing at the futility of churches and pastors that try to hold up man made rules as if they have any power over the flesh.
Or as the SS's said, "An inconvenient fact like that is certainly apt to take the wind out of the sails of those who think that creating and living in a lifestyle of systematized legalism is a safeguard against sin."
Amen, ladies. Well said.
-Carolyn
The Tiber Creek piece is total satire. How or why would anyone promote this as a serious news story boggles the mind and calls into question the judgement and motives of the creator of this blog. I'll eat my hat if this comment is published.
Eat your hat,
Looking back, I see that I was caught. You're right -- I had a lack of discernment on that one! Don't know what I was thinking. Looking at it again all I can say is DUH! Thanks for pointing that out.
I have at times posted satire as if it is true so as to make a point. When I took a quick look at the article just now I assumed it was another one I was using in that regard, which is why I quickly posted a response to you. Then I saw a previous comment by me taking it seriously and just shook my head at what happened. I must have been half asleep.
The hat was yummy. :-)
It happens to the best of us.
Thank you for your gracious response.
Sara,
I want people to tell me when I screw up. I'm always open to correction. :)
Post a Comment