We who preach the gospel must not think of ourselves as public relations agents sent to establish good will between Christ and the world. We must not imagine ourselves commissioned to make Christ acceptable to big business, the press, the world of sports or modern education. We are not diplomats but prophets, and our message is not a compromise but an ultimatum. A.W. Tozer
Therefore let God-inspired Scripture decide between us; and on whichever side be found doctrines in harmony with the word of God, in favor of that side will be cast the vote of truth. --Basil of Caesarea
Once you learn to discern, there's no going back. You will begin to spot the lie everywhere it appears.

I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who has strengthened me, because He considered me faithful, putting me into service. 1 Timothy 1:12

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Catholic Iconography and the “Saints.”


This article was originally published on 6/28/10 but, as with the others in this series, I thought it needed to be revisited after 15 years. FYI: after I post each part of this series, I take down the original so as to not have two of the same post. But the posts are cut and pasted so as to be identical except for this introduction.

======


Catholicism teaches that images may be made of the apostles and other “saints” (contrary to the Bible’s teaching that all Christians are saints, Rome has to declare people saints after their death based on their good works and other qualifications) so that the faithful may venerate them. Images may be statues or pictures of various types (glass, mosaic, paintings, etc). Let’s look at some paragraphs from the Catechism on this subject:


Paras. 476, 477 “Since the Word became flesh in assuming a true humanity, Christ's body was finite. Therefore the human face of Jesus can be portrayed; at the seventh ecumenical council (Nicaea II in 787) the Church recognized its representation in holy images to be legitimate. At the same time the Church has always acknowledged that in the body of Jesus ‘we see our God made visible and so are caught up in love of the God we cannot see.’ The individual characteristics of Christ's body express the divine person of God's Son. He has made the features of his human body his own, to the point that they can be venerated when portrayed in a holy image, for the believer ‘who venerates the icon is venerating in it the person of the one depicted’.”


Paras. 1159-1162 “The sacred image, the liturgical icon, principally represents Christ. It cannot represent the invisible and incomprehensible God, but the incarnation of the Son of God has ushered in a new "economy" of images… Christian iconography expresses in images the same Gospel message that Scripture communicates by words. Image and word illuminate each other… All the signs in the liturgical celebrations are related to Christ: as are sacred images of the holy Mother of God and of the saints as well. They truly signify Christ, who is glorified in them. They make manifest the ‘cloud of witnesses’ who continue to participate in the salvation of the world and to whom we are united, above all in sacramental celebrations. Through their icons, it is man ‘in the image of God,’ finally transfigured ‘into his likeness,’ who is revealed to our faith. So too are the angels, who also are recapitulated in Christ: ‘Following the divinely inspired teaching of our holy Fathers and the tradition of the Catholic Church (for we know that this tradition comes from the Holy Spirit who dwells in her) we rightly define with full certainty and correctness that, like the figure of the precious and life-giving cross, venerable and holy images of our Lord and God and Savior, Jesus Christ, our inviolate Lady, the holy Mother of God, and the venerated angels, all the saints and the just, whether painted or made of mosaic or another suitable material, are to be exhibited in the holy churches of God, on sacred vessels and vestments, walls and panels, in houses and on streets.’ … the contemplation of sacred icons, united with meditation on the Word of God and the singing of liturgical hymns, enters into the harmony of the signs of celebration so that the mystery celebrated is imprinted in the heart's memory and is then expressed in the new life of the faithful.


Note also that Catholics pray to the saints for intercession on our behalf.


What response do we have from Scripture? Firstly, Scripture says we are not to make any image to worship or bow down to it because that would be idolatry. (Exod. 20:4-5a)


Secondly, how does anyone know what Jesus looked like? Would not any image of Christ therefore be from someone’s imagination and not really what Christ looked like, and therefore would not the veneration be of another god - one of the artist’s making? Let’s make an analogy here. If I carry a photo of a model in my wallet and tell everyone this photo represents my wife, would I be properly representing my wife? Would it be respectful of my wife or would it cause her to be jealous? God tells us that He is a jealous God, which is why He commands no images for worship.


Images of saints, although not being of God, are nevertheless not to be worshiped (including “veneration”). And, as with images of Christ, these images would be false representations since we do not know what the people looked like.


The issue of praying to the saints would be the same as with praying to Mary. These people are dead and we do not communicate with the dead. Although the Catholic church claims that Mary and the saints are in heaven and are therefore not bound by space and time, the reality is that they would have to be omniscient to hear prayers from people all over the world. The plain fact is that we are told in Scripture that prayers are directed only at God, never to people.


The veneration of the saints and icons is part of the daily practice for Roman Catholics, and yet this is plainly unbiblical and idolatry.


Summary:


We have seen in this series on Roman Catholicism that Rome’s claim to papal infallibility being directly from God, as well as papal authority, is belied by the history of papal behaviors and teaching which are against what God has told us in the Bible. The Church’s claim to authority of the Magisterium for teaching and interpretation of Scripture has no Scriptural basis, but is a tool of control.


We have also seen that Rome’s works-based system of salvation is directly opposed to the Bible’s teaching of salvation by faith alone, in Christ alone. We’ve examined transubstantiation and the mass, and how it does not resemble anything found in Scripture. We’ve seen how Mary is looked at as being almost equal with Christ in the way they pray to her, worship her, and give her unbiblical attributes of perpetual virginity, sinlessness, and the ability to hear and answer prayer. And, finally, we’ve looked at iconography and veneration of saints, both of which are prohibited by the Bible.


These are the heavy burdens of legalism placed upon the members of the Roman Catholic Church, which result in the Roman Catholic Church being a cultic organization, in which the majority of its members are not true Christians (as testimony after testimony of ex-members attest).


How do we then witness to Catholics? The best way is to show them that salvation is a one-time thing and that it is not as a result of works. Point them to Christ, and not to Mary, for salvation. And that everything their leaders say should be passed through the grid of Scripture.

5 comments:

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Lorna sent me the following comment to post here.
==========
Glenn, This was a beneficial series from you and well worth re-posting, I believe. The use of the words “unbiblical” and “idolatry” in several of your post titles says it all. Sadly, the Roman Catholic religion is so permeated with unbiblical and nonbiblical dogma that the glorious gospel is essentially smothered. Sitting under RCC teaching and participating in its church practices make it virtually impossible for a genuine seeker of God to find Him--or to avoid works-righteousness and legalism, as you point out. I never understand why, as the prevailing church, they felt it necessary to add so much extraneous teachings to the Christian faith, which is already profound and robust in its pure form. I am confident that the leaders of the RCC will be judged harshly for keeping so many people out of the Kingdom of God over the centuries through its perversion of His truth. The thoughts in your final paragraph are true, of course, but I suspect, sadly, that the typical Catholic is trusting in “the Mother Church” above all else and will not easily veer from his/her devotion to it rather than God and His Word. (Of course, this is exactly as Satan would have it.) However, God is able to reach even earnest Catholics (as He did me), and I pray that He continues to graciously do so, to His glory!

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Thank you, Lorna, for such a thoughtful comment.

This series was taken from an apologetics course I wrote, by request, for homeschool high-schoolers. In fact, all those articles on cults and hermeneutics posted in 2010: March and April, June (now recently), Eastern Orthodoxy in July, JWs in August, Seventh-day Adventists in September, Churches of Christ and "Local Church" in October. Stuff on Mormons was moved to "The Anti-Mormon Blog."

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

The following comment by requested to be posted by Mary:

Hello Glenn, and your lovely wife,
I am so sorry you have had to disable comments on both of your blogs. I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart that you are persevering in pointing out error, especially your current posts on Catholicism. 43 years of being Catholic, 12 years of Catholic school training. But when I read the verse ‘many will call me Lord, Lord, but I will say I never knew you’ that verse just terrified me. 32 years now a born again Christian, I am still passionate about learning the truth. I prayed to Mary and the saints, I carried holy cards with pictures of them, I prayed the rosary. May God forgive me. I now worship at Grace Bible church, no iconography allowed! May God richly bless you and your family. Please keep educating us and showing us the errors. I’ve read your blog for probably 10 years now. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Mary asked for this to be posted as a "p.s."

I decided to add another comment. I have been worshiping at a Baptist Church for almost 20 years, and made the difficult decision that it was time to find a church that is more biblically grounded. I think the church I was attending went off the rails when they had female pastors, which led to female pastors preaching on Sunday morning. I have now found a church that is very biblically grounded. The prayer time is centered on a particular psalm, and the preaching is teaching through a book of the Bible verse by verse. We are currently in Zachariah, which I have never studied before. their church governing is also very biblical, several male elders. I feel that your ministry has helped give me the courage to make this difficult change. Thank you again for your perseverance!

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

Hi Mary,

Jill and I have both been blessed by your first comment, and are so thankful you found your way out of the Papist Church. As for your second comment, it shows how much you have grown in the faith and acquired some good discernment.

Thank you for your kind words,