We who preach the gospel must not think of ourselves as public relations agents sent to establish good will between Christ and the world. We must not imagine ourselves commissioned to make Christ acceptable to big business, the press, the world of sports or modern education. We are not diplomats but prophets, and our message is not a compromise but an ultimatum. A.W. Tozer
Therefore let God-inspired Scripture decide between us; and on whichever side be found doctrines in harmony with the word of God, in favor of that side will be cast the vote of truth. --Basil of Caesarea
Once you learn to discern, there's no going back. You will begin to spot the lie everywhere it appears.

I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who has strengthened me, because He considered me faithful, putting me into service. 1 Timothy 1:12

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

When Worship Becomes Entertainment


The ubiquitous culture of consumerism and materialism has seduced many evangelicals into a ministry mode driven by marketing rather than mission. To an ever greater extent, evangelicals are accommodating themselves to moral compromise in the name of lifestyle and choice. Authentic biblical worship is often supplanted by the entertainment culture as issues of performance and taste displace the simplicity and God-centeredness of true worship. Our churches are worldly in lifestyle, worship, and piety. We have seen the worship of God too often made into a human-centered entertainment event.


Al Mohler, Jr. (1996). Cited by Dan Lucarini, Why I Left the Contemporary Christian Music Movement, pg.63

Monday, October 8, 2018

He Hideth My Soul


A wonderful Savior is Jesus my Lord,
A wonderful Savior to me;
He hideth my soul in the cleft of the rock,
Where rivers of pleasure I see.

Refrain:
He hideth my soul in the cleft of the rock,
That shadows a dry, thirsty land;
He hideth my life in the depths of His love,
And covers me there with His hand,
And covers me there with His hand.

A wonderful Savior is Jesus my Lord,
He taketh my burden away,
He holdeth me up and I shall not be moved,
He giveth me strength as my day.

With numberless blessings each moment He crowns,
And filled with His fullness divine,
I sing in my rapture, oh, glory to God!
For such a Redeemer as mine.

When clothed with His brightness transported I rise
To meet Him in clouds of the sky,
His perfect salvation, His wonderful love,
I’ll shout with the millions on high.

Fanny Crosby

Sunday, October 7, 2018

Come As You Are?


The “Come as you are, God accepts you where you are at” doctrine is closely aligned with the tolerance movement that is popular in our secular society. … this is laying the foundations for some serious religious disillusionment down the road. The real test of any Christian teaching, however, is not either its short-term or long-term consequences, but whether or not it is found in the Word of Go.  How does this doctrine stand tup to that test?

Is there any biblical truth behind “come as you are”? It certainly reflects the biblical principle that to God “all our righteousnesses are like filthy rags” (Isaiah 64:6). There is nothing we can do to earn our salvation; we cannot make ourselves clean enough to be acceptable to God. But does that also mean we can stay as we are?

John Makujina, a scholar who assiduously researched the CCM movement, has stated that, 
Whereas many conservatives preached what amounts to “Clean yourself up before you receive Christ,” the Jesus movement [where CCM began] said more biblical, “Come as you are.’ The problem however was that come as you are more often meant “remain as you are,” at least as far as music, language, clothing, and social habits are concerned. 

The only biblical justification I have heard for this doctrine is the story in John 8 concerning the woman caught in adultery. But we cannot forget that after the Pharisees left, Jesus said to the woman, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.” Jesus did not accept her as she was—he commanded her to change. Neither does Jesus accept us as we are. When we become his disciples, he expects us to sin no more, to show a change in our affections from idols to him, and for us to turn from the loss of the world and love him.

There is no biblical proof of a God who accepts anyone for “who he is.” God is not interested in our self-esteem or our filthy rags. Examine the evidence and judge for yourself. … Jesus did not accept a sinner’s sin.  He preached repentance from sin to everyone, not just to the Pharisees. …

The New Testament clearly teaches that genuine conversion produces a changed—and changing—life. … The honest “seeker” must conclude that this “come as you are” teaching of God’s unconditional acceptance is at best misleading. We cannot come to God just as we are, with our sin unconfessed or ignored or draped all over us, and still expect his acceptance. We cannot drag our favourite worldly music, dress and language into the church, and expect a blessing! That is wishful thinking with no basis in Scripture. Nor would we want “unchurched seekers” to believe they can hang on to their sins and still be accepted by God. …

Acceptance doctrine is so pervasive in some fellowships that Christians are no longer allowed to question another Christian’s behaviour or personal preferences. If you confront another in love, you will be accused of judging them. If you dare quote chapter and verse from the Bible, you will be called a Pharisee. If a church has any practices that step on the toes anyone’s personal preferences, then it is considered to be a legalistic church. …

In this new Church of Acceptance, showing tolerance for worldly affections and behaviours is far more important than exercising biblical discernment. A person is simply not allowed to question another’s personal preference, and if he does, then he must produce a specific Bible verse to back it up.

Dan Lucarini, Why I Left the Contemporary Christian Music Movement, pg.38-41

Thursday, October 4, 2018

Why Contemporary Christian Music for Worship?


I also believe the real motive for adopting CCM for praise and worship was not, as we were often told, to evangelize those from outside the church, but was rooted in a need to satisfy our own desires for our favourite music.

Dan Lucarini, Why I Left the Contemporary Christian Music Movement, pg.18

Tuesday, October 2, 2018

Good, Bad, and Ugly

The Good:
The slow killing of congregational singing.  Yes, I’ve witnessed this so much over the years.

A Christian can not be pro-abortion and adhere the Christian faith.

Good article explaining the cult of Scientology.

The Gospel is described throughout the New Testament, moreso than you’d think.

An interesting history lesson.

The Bad and/or Ugly
Hillsong is now a denomination.  Just what we need, another cult.

When are Catholics going to wake up and see how demonic their pope is!?! Oh, he really knows how to abuse Scripture to demand governments commit suicide.

Bethel and Bill Johnson: about as aberrant and occultic as it gets.  Good examination of what is wrong with this movement.

Oh, the depths of depravity in the Anglican Church; nothing Christian here!

The social gospel is heresy, plain and simple.

This is the Episcopal Church.  It is not a Christian church; the Episcopal Church long, long ago turned its back on Christ and joined the world against God.

When it comes to sexual abuse in the church, the Mormon church is much like the Roman Catholic Church.

Why is it that Christian colleges have difficulty with standing by God’s teachings on homosexuality? Would they react the same to students who commit adultery or bestiality? Christians should leave these colleges because the colleges are more interested in pleasing man than pleasing God. They have betrayed Christ.

If you want to see just how bad Rachel Held Evans is, read the review of her book, “Inspired.” This page is of chapter four, but it has links to all the previous chapter reviews.  The woman is no more a Christian than was Adolf Hitler. H/T Neil Simpson

And of course there is the current “Christian” media idol, Jen Hatmaker. She is also no more Christian than was Adolf Hitler!

More about Beth Moore — as if you haven’t read enough about her on this blog proving what a horrid teacher she is.

This is an example of what apostasy looks like.

More evidence against Tim Keller; he preaches a Marxist social gospel. Cameron Beuttel explains a lot about Keller’s false ideology.

Monday, October 1, 2018

Signs and Wonders?


It is ironic that Charismatics, who consider themselves experts on the Holy Spirit, completely misunderstand the purpose of the Holy Spirit’s ministry. Does the Bible teach that the Holy Spirit came so that we could have a wonderful, subjective experience? So that we could have wonderful religious sensations? So that we could feel electric current in our bodies? So that we could have an exciting, mind-blowing experience? So the our worship services would make people go, “Wow, how thrilling”? Does the Bible teach that the Holy Spirit came so that people would focus on the Holy Spirit? So that people would hang banners with representations of doves in their churches and have seminars on Spirit-baptism, etc.? No, not at all. Listen carefully to what Jesus Christ says about the Spirit’s ministry: “When He, the Spirit of truth, has come…He will glorify Me, for He will take of what is Mine and declare it to you” (Jn.16:13-14). The Holy Spirit came to point me to Christ and to glorify Christ. After Peter was baptized in the Spirit, did he stand up and tell the crowd about his wonderful experience? Did he say, “Men and brethren, I have just received the baptism of the Holy Spirit, and I want to tell you how wonderful it is. When it came upon me, it was like being thrilled with a vital electric current. I felt such a beautiful love and peace course through my whole body, right down to the balls of my feet”? On the contrary, Peter made no reference to himself or his feeling. His message was Jesus Christ and Him crucified: “Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God…” (Ac. 2:22).  . . .

The Bible teaches that signs are public, visible, miraculous events. Their purpose was not to give believers exciting worship services or a wonderful experience but to authenticate a divine message or messenger, to prove publicly that the person performing miracles was sent from God.

Brian M. Schwertley, The Charismatic Movement: A Biblical Critique, pg.10-11, 30-31.

Friday, September 28, 2018

Personal Bible Notes: Exodus Through Deuteronomy


Refer to my 9/25/18 post about the margin notes in my Bible, and why I decided to share them on this blog.  

These are my notes for Exodus:

Chapter 15: This poem is four movements: 1 & 2 looking back, 3 looking forward, 4 the coming of God’s Kingdom at the end.
Movement 1 is 1-5, movement 2 is 6-10, movement 3 is 11-16, movement 4 is  17-18.

16:29: God gave the Sabbath to Israel.

20:8: Christians are not required because it is a sign of the covenant with Israel.

21:22-25: The value of the unborn child.

31:13:  The Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel only.

32:8: compare with Gal. 1:6.

34:14 “jealous”: Jealous to protect what is His.

Notes for Leviticus:

2:1 “anyone”:  Hebrew “living being.”

Chap 11:  “detestable to you”: not detestable to God.

Chap 18: These are pagan practices Israel is to NOT follow, including sexual immorality.

Chap 20: Starts a new context from 19. More pagan practices that Israel is NOT to follow because it will make them like the detestable pagans.

Chap 26: “If, then” covenant.  IF Israel obeys, THEN God blesses; IF Israel disobeys, then God punishes.

Notes for Numbers:

13:32-33: This is an outright lie to discourage the people. The Nephilim were wiped out in the Flood.

21:5: “spoke against God”: see 1 Cor. 10:9.

Notes for Deuteronomy:

1:39: Children don’t know good from evil.

4:2:  Don’t add to, or subtract from, God’s Word.
4:8: Only Israel has the Law.
4:24: Jealous to protect what is His.

5:3: The covenant was not with those prior to Moses.
5:15: The reason for the Sabbath; only between Israel and God.

17:6-7: Witnesses needed for execution.
17:17: Against polygamy.

18:22: The test of a prophet.

22:5 a woman not to wear men’s clothing:  This possibly means not to wear a warrior’s/soldier’s clothing, as per Josephus 4:8:43.

32:16, 17, 21: note the parallels/synonyms: “foreign gods,” “demons,” “so-called gods”

Thursday, September 27, 2018

Think About It


There is nothing ini the world so damaged that it cannot be repaired by the hand of Almighty God. I encourage you to know this because without this certainty we should all of us be mad.

Hercule Poirot, Appointment with Death

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Personal Bible Notes


I have a lot of margin notes in my Bible, which I’ve either come up with my own thoughts about a passage or gathered ideas from the many commentaries I’ve read or sermons I’ve heard over the years.

I decided that I needed to copy all these notes down in the event I ever lose my Bible, so that I can write them in any future Bible.  Today I was working on my notes in Genesis and I thought perhaps my readers may benefit from them, so as I collect them I will be posting them for anyone who may be interested.  Now, mind you, these are just my notes and not the commentary notes at the bottom of the pages in my Bible (which is The Apologetics Study Bible).

So with that said, here are my notes for Genesis.

1:3 “then”:  Starts earth time.
1:26, et. al. “image”: reflection of God’s spiritual nature.
1:28: “God blessed them”: Reason why he did not curse them later?

2:2 “rested”:  Rested to demonstrate that His task was complete.
2:3 “holy”: “holy” means “set apart.” Set apart for what? Not told.
2:4 “LORD”: YHWH — God’s personal name for relationship.
2:9 “knowledge of good and evil”: The power to decide what is or is not one’s best interests.
2:15 “work it”: Hebrew means “cultivate” — this becomes worship.
2:15 “watch over it”: Hebrew means “keep” it — this is spiritual service.
2:18 “helper”: One who comes along side as God is Israel’s helper.
2:24 “This is why”: Defines marriage.

3:3 “or touch it”: Eve added this.
3:6 “too”: Hebrew means “took away,” “carried away,” “removed.” This tells me she was alone when she took it from the tree and took it to Adam.  He was not there when she talked with the serpent.
3:17: God did not curse Adam & Eve as he did the serpent.
3:21: “God made clothing out of skins”: animals were sacrificed by God.

4:1,2: Hebrew implies a twin sister to Cain. “had a male chid”: “had” means “acquired.” Hebrew is a play on words with Cain meaning “faithful to God.” Abel is really “Hebel” in Hebrew, meaning “steam” — passing away quickly, and probably given after death vs a birth name. Hebrew implies Abel had 2 sisters, i.e. triplets. 
4:3 “Cain presented some”: i.e., not the best.
4:7: “If you do right…”: Refutes Calvinism.

6:2: “sons of God”: Augustine and Chrysostom started the idea they were human.

8:22: refutes the idea of man-caused climate change.

9:1: Directed only at Noah and sons, not to everyone in the world.
9:3:  Eating animals is now okay.
9:22: Old Jewish tradition says that Ham castrated Noah to prevent a 4th son to share inheritance, which is why Noah cursed Ham’s 4th son.

12:8 “worshiped Him”: Hebrew means public proclamation of truth, i.e. “public reading.” Luther said “preached the name of the Lord.”

22:11, 12 “the Angel of the LORD”… “from Me”:  Theophany, pre-incarnate Jesus. Obviously the “Angel” is God.  
22:14 “will be provided”: Word is ambiguous; could also mean “will be seen”— both are true. 

24:50: “answered” is singular but two are there. Literally, they were together but Laban answered for his father, usurping his father’s role. That’s why Laban’s name is first.

25:27 “quiet man”: literally “upright, blameless”

27:45 “Then I will send for you”: Sent nurse, as noted in 35:8.

31:29:  “the God of your father”: Not Laban’s God!
31:53: Laban is an idolater.

35:8: Deborah had been sent to tell Jacob that Esau had “cooled”

37:3 “robe of many colors”: Hebrew literally means long coat with full sleeves, as with royalty.

38:9 “whenever”: i.e., this happened often, not just once; God gave him a chance obviously.
38:15 “covered her face”: A veil was what a bride wore on her wedding night; prostitutes imitated this.

41:16: God interprets dreams, not man.

48: 2 “sat up in bed”: “leaned on top of his staff” is more accurate.



Saturday, September 22, 2018

Gail Riplinger’s “New Age Bible Versions”

I read this book the first time when I bought it back in 1996 because the title intrigued me. By the time I finished it I had decided that the author was seriously in error. A few years later I decided to go through it in detail to mark errors and even began to write a review. Time has a way of getting away from me and I never got it properly done.

So, back in January 2013 I began a chapter-by-chapter review of this book with the object of posting it on this blog. My objective was to look at each individual claim Riplinger made against each individual passage from “new” Bible versions when compared to the KJV.  It was an arduous task to get through the first 23 Chapters!

Chapter 23 finishes on page 350 of the book. There are a total of 42 chapters, and epilogue, and three appendices. I have decided to end this quest due to the horrendous amount of time it takes when the rest of the book has the exact same problems as the 23 chapters already finished, so one will not learn anything new about the author even though you won’t get to see the non-problems with the specific passages she addresses.

The main problems with Riplinger are pretty much summed up as follows:

She uses excessive diatribes and rhetoric, as well as just plain foolishness.
She exudes paranoia.
She uses much vitriolic nonsense.
She abuses scripture by taking passages out of context.
She either fails to understand context or simply disregards it.
She misrepresents other versions.
She promotes conspiracy theories.
She makes unwarranted assertions, suppositions, and assumptions
She claims to know what Satan is thinking.
She makes complaints about writing style.
She makes ad hominem attacks and unsubstantiated claims against people and organizations who have connections to new Bible versions.
She claims other versions are hiding references to Satan.
She is very dishonest in her claims, especially when handling texts used for comparisons.
She lacks understanding of basic logic.
She lacks understanding of word definitions.
She exudes extreme anti-Catholic bigotry and paranoia.
She claims that Roman Catholic meanings are in new versions.
She dogmatically claims that her interpretation of Revelation is the correct one.
She libels people and organizations.
She practices eisegesis.
She has a lack of understanding Greek.
She makes many proven-false charges.
She practices much equivocation.

For quick reference to those interested in this topic, here are links to all the chapter reviews already posted: