In my opinion, advocating, allowing and practicing psychiatric and psychoanalytical dogmas within the church is every bit as pagan and heretical (and therefore perilous) as propagating the teachings of some of the most bizarre cults. The only vital difference is that the cults are less dangerous because their errors are more identifiable, since they are controverted by existing creedal statements.
Jay Adams, A Theology of Christian Counseling, pp.xi,xii
4 comments:
I majored in Psychology at Stetson University. After having done so, I concluded that (by my actual measurement) 97.456372847% of it is pure, unadulterated bunk.
Physiological Psychology is the only division that stands a chance of being real science, and 93.462746352% of IT is bunk.
I also majored in psychology - yuck! The only class I consider worthwhile was statistics.
By the way, Joe, I believe you are quite generous. I believe it is all bunk. Studying human behavior without considering the nature of man can only result in worthless conclusions. You are right - psychology is bunk.
Over the years of seeing all sorts of pyschobabble used to excuse people of personal responsibility, as well as being used to justify sexual perversions of every sort, I decided to study what I could about the field.
My supervisor took Psychology 101 in college, and loaned me his textbook; the more I read in there the more appalled I was at the field. That led me to Purchasing some books by E.Fuller Torrey, and from there my library on the subject began to grow.
Back in about 2005 a friend asked me to partner with him in a seminary class paper on the psych fields (they were allowed to team with anyone as their partner), and that was an interesting exercise. I eventually posted my share of the report in a series on this blog (look under the label for "Psychology"), which you may find interesting - if you haven't already been there.
Post a Comment