Tuesday, July 1, 2025

No God If Evolution Is True


Whether it is a committed belief or an uninformed consent, the atheist/secularist viewpoint starts with teaching the theory of evolution as fact. Why? Because, if evolution is true, God cannot be. … If all life accidentally sprang from a soup of chemicals, then evolved into a billion species, what room is left for God? 


Duane Arthur Schmidt, “And God Created Darwin: The Death of Darwinian Evolution,” pg.ix


7 comments:

  1. But evolution is true. So what are you going to do?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (This comment made me laugh.) Actually, it would be you, Anonymous, who would have much “to do”--like produce transitional fossils and explain “life arising from non-life” nonsense (and a million other quandaries). Creationists don’t need “to do” anything but enjoy God’s creation and give Him praise.

      Delete
  2. Sorry, but there is absolutely no evidence for evolution. It's all speculations and assertions. Maybe you should get a copy of the book. Since evolution is a fraud, you need to seek God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Okay, tough guy, give me your single strongest piece of scientific evidence against evolution. Give me an argument in your own words, Take your time and think it through as time allows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glenn is the “tough guy,” Anonymous? Isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black? And most of us creationists did “think it through,” while evolution advocates must deny logic and clear evidence at every turn. Rather than offering up scoffing with no substance, please visit Answers In Genesis, Creation.com, or The Institute for Creation Research for starters; there is also much printed materials available for study and well-done museums that explore the issue in-depth. Warning: It will require intelligence and a true desire to know truth to get educated on this issue.

      Delete
  4. My strongest piece of scientific evidence against evolution is that there is NO scientific evidence FOR evolution!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like how those like this anonymous visitor acts as if the entire theory isn't basically rejected by almost the entire scientific community. The very fact there are no "in-between" fossils...or any other kind of evidence, for that matter...of anything which isn't just another animal unto itself.

      Delete

PLEASE DO NOT ENTER YOUR COMMENT MORE THAN ONCE - it will not show until moderated. Comments with links - either with the commenter's name or in the text of the comment - which link to sites with heretical, aberrational, obscene or otherwise improper teaching, will not be published with said links. Comments which are mostly, or only, ad hominem attacks will not be published.